Rating summary
Movie | | 5.0 |
Video | | 5.0 |
Audio | | 5.0 |
Extras | | 4.5 |
Overall | | 5.0 |
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Blu-ray Movie Review
Funny Games
Reviewed by Michael Reuben April 26, 2016
There are many reasons why Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? is a landmark film. It was the first
feature directed by Mike Nichols, inaugurating a career that would encompass The Graduate,
The Birdcage and Carnal Knowledge. It was the first film to have its entire credited cast
nominated for Oscars and the second in history to be nominated in every category for which it
was eligible (thirteen in all, with five wins). It ushered in a new era of frankness in Hollywood's
treatment of mature subject matter, dealing a death blow to the Production Code (often called
"the Hays Code") that had governed America's screens since 1930. It was the first film to carry
an explicit warning that no one under 18 would be admitted without an accompanying adult.
Statistics aside, though, Virginia Woolf remains a vital work today, fifty years after its initial
release, because an unlikely group of collaborators successfully translated Edward Albee's
original play to the screen with the same furious intensity that first electrified audiences in 1962.
Albee's play continues to be revived, restaged and reinterpreted (twice on Broadway in the last
twelve years), but Nichols' film has become an essential part of the drama's lore. No other
classic of the American stage has received a more effective translation to the screen.
For Virginia Woolf's fiftieth anniversary, the Warner Archive Collection has rescanned and
restored the film for Blu-ray and accompanied it with the wealth of extras assembled for the 2006
DVD special edition.
At the most basic level,
Virginia Woolf is a portrait of two marriages—or perhaps it would be
more accurate to call it an excavation. The action plays out over one late Saturday night and early
Sunday morning at an unnamed university in a fictional New England town. (The production
used Smith College for exteriors.) A couple in their fifties, George and Martha (Richard Burton
and Elizabeth Taylor), walk home across the campus after a faculty party. Martha, the more
aggressive drinker of the pair, is staggering.
The opening scenes provide a first look at the couple's complex marriage. George is an Associate
Professor of History (and
only an Associate Professor, as his wife repeatedly reminds him), while
Martha is the daughter of the university's president. She married George when he appeared to be
a rising star in academia. Life has disappointed them both, but they are partners in
disenchantment, filling their days and nights with barbs, banter and, yes, affection. Martha will
later confide to a near-stranger that George is the only man she has ever loved. George, who
initially appears to be beaten down by his wife's brassy extroversion, will gradually reveal
hidden reserves of wily aggression. The fact that the couple bears the same names as America's
founding President and First Lady is an intentional irony.
On this night, though, the delicate balance (to borrow another Albee title) that keeps the marriage
of George and Martha poised on the edge of mutual tolerance is upset by the arrival of another
couple, Nick and Honey (George Segal and Sandy Dennis). He is a new addition to the faculty, a
member of the Biology Department, although Martha mistakenly thinks he's in math and, as
George immediately suspects, she doesn't particularly care what subject he teaches but only that he's
young and handsome. Honey is his dutiful wife who, from the moment they appear onscreen,
seems mismatched with this former quarterback and current golden boy of the sciences. Despite
the late hour, Martha has invited the couple to join her and George for drinks, and Nick and
Honey obey because Martha is, after all, the president's daughter.
With Honey and Nick as her audience, and fueled by continuous drinking, Martha rapidly
exceeds the customary boundaries of the loaded repartee with which she and George pass their
hours. She pushes him too hard, says too much and lurches into prohibited topics like the
couple's absent son. As George rises to the provocation, the evening turns violent: not so much
physical violence (although that, too, occurs, improbably cheered on by an intoxicated Honey)
but an emotional blitzkrieg waged by two highly articulate individuals who know each other's
weak spots intimately. Nick and Honey are initially uncomfortable and bewildered by the
maelstrom into which they have blundered, but they are helpless to resist, becoming pawns in the
high-stakes match between their hosts. With the practiced eye of experienced combatants, Martha
and George (particularly George) sniff out the younger couple's weaknesses and hammer on the
fractures in their marriage. Secrets are revealed, lies exposed, and at some point in the evening,
each partner betrays the other. Like the original play, the film leaves the viewer to decide how (or
whether) each couple will find their way forward after their parting at dawn.
The script of
Virginia Woolf is officially credited to Ernest Lehman (
Sweet Smell of Success),
who, as Albee later commented, wrote "about twenty-five words". Indeed, Nichols rejected
Lehman's script, which changed the ending, and returned to Albee's original text. With trims for
running time and a few substituted words to satisfy the concerns of the MPAA,
Virginia Woolf is
heard in the film just as Albee wrote it. Freed from the stage's spatial constraints, Nichols'
camera roams throughout George's and Martha's house—the play is confined to their living
room—ventures into the front and back yard and, in a controversial decision, follows the
foursome to a roadside bar for dancing, more drinks and several of the night's most brutal
confrontations. Nichols and cinematographer Haskell Wexler use deep focus, odd angles and
carefully selected closeups to pull viewers into the fray and give the escalating conflicts a
visceral immediacy. (Albee, who generally approved of the film, complained that it lost the
"intellectual" level of his text, but it's there if you look for it.)
The casting of Taylor and Burton raised eyebrows at the time (including Albee's), not only due to
the stars' own tempestuous marriage, but also because Taylor, at 32, was twenty years younger
than her character. Under Nichols' direction, however, both actors deliver career-best
performances. Burton speaks George's literate dialogue with naturalistic ease, free of the
thespian mannerisms on which he would fall back later in his career, as his own drinking sapped
his gifts. Taylor's Martha was (and remains) a revelation. Gaining thirty pounds, aging herself
with hair and makeup, and shedding every trace of the glamorous movie star who dominated the
era's gossip columns, the actress conveys Martha's anger, her cruelty and her desperate need for
love with an emotional transparency that is both terrifying and painful. When George accuses her
of being a monster, Martha famously replies: "I'm loud and I'm vulgar, and I wear the pants in the
house because somebody's got to, but I am
not a monster. I'm
not!"—and Taylor's delivery is so
fraught that she conveys both Martha's furious denial and her frightened suspicion that a monster
is exactly what she's become. (Nichols has said that, no matter how good Taylor's performance
seemed on the set, when he saw it on film, it was ten times better.)
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Blu-ray Movie, Video Quality
The original cinematographer for Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Harry Stradling, Sr.
(Suspicion) was fired during pre-production and
replaced by Haskell Wexler (Bound for Glory),
who won an Oscar for the film's expressive black-and-white images. Accordingly to Wexler,
Stradling lost the job after telling director Mike Nichols that he hated Fellini's 8˝ , whose style
Nichols wanted to emulate.
Virginia Woolf was made in an era when release prints were indiscriminately struck directly from
the original camera negative, which had sustained significant damage by the time the studio
began its film preservation efforts many years later. Those efforts led to the creation of a fine-grain master
positive, which Warner's MPI facility has newly scanned (at 2K) for this 1080p, AVC-encoded
Blu-ray. Substantial restoration was performed in the digital domain to repair damage and
remove dirt and scratches.
The Blu-ray image is superb. Wexler's lighting creates a sense of depth that is essential to
Nichols' expressive arrangement of the characters in physical space. The solid blacks, well-delineated shades of gray and finely rendered film grain
reveal exceptional detail throughout
George's and Martha's unkempt home in a decaying campus house, where Richard Sylbert's
Oscar-winning production design tells you as much about their marriage as Albee's dialogue.
(When Martha famously declares the place a "dump", you can see just what she means.) Faces
are vividly displayed, revealing tiny flickers of reaction and shifts of emotion. Some of Wexler's
shots are almost painterly in their rendering of mood (e.g., the long shot of George sitting alone
on a swing; see screenshot #14). Even the pedestrian decor of the roadhouse location makes a
contribution; its banality contrasts sharply with the events that prompt Honey to squeal
"Violence!" with delight.
Having transferred and restored Virginia Woolf with care, WAC has mastered it on Blu-ray with
its usual high average bitrate of just under 35 Mbps and an excellent encode.
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Blu-ray Movie, Audio Quality
Virginia Woolf's mono soundtrack has been restored from the original magnetic tracks and
encoded in lossless DTS-HD MA 2.0, with identical left and right channels. The dialogue has
been faithfully and clearly rendered, including those portions where Nichols and editor Sam
O'Steen deliberately overlapped speakers (a rarity in American films at the time). The track
features numerous small sound effects, many of which are meant to register subliminally: the
clink of glasses, the rattling of ice cubes, the repeated pouring of drinks. An occasional effect
registers forcefully for dramatic purpose (e.g., the ringing of chimes that awakens Honey at the
top of the third act, or the sudden lurch of the car when the foursome veers off to the roadhouse).
All of these sounds have been artfully layered into the mix to sound like natural occurrences.
Alex North (Spartacus) provided the spare score, which
contains almost no recurring themes. It's
more a collection of individual compositions, each one crafted to a specific moment in the
drama.
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Blu-ray Movie, Special Features and Extras
Virginia Woolf has appeared on DVD multiple times, beginning with a 1997 release that included
a commentary by Haskell Wexler. That commentary also appeared on the 2006 two-disc edition
assembled for the "Elizabeth Taylor & Richard Burton Film Collection", which added a second
commentary and other new features. The two commentaries were included on a 2010 single-DVD reissue.
For Blu-ray, WAC has ported over all of the extras from the 2006 two-disc edition. It's an
impressive set.
- Commentaries
- With Cinematographer Haskell Wexler: Wexler focuses on the technical details of
shooting the film, discussing lights, lenses and exposures and pointing out shots
that involved special challenges. He also describes how he was hired (which
required abandoning another commitment), discusses his working relationship
with Nichols and relates anecdotes about Taylor, Burton and the crew. Near the
end of his commentary, which concludes half an hour before the film, Wexler
briefly discusses the making of Medium Cool, which he
directed.
- With Director Mike Nichols and Steven Soderbergh: Following on their successful
collaboration on a DVD commentary for Catch-22, Soderbergh and Nichols
discuss both Virginia Woolf and the craft of directing. Nichols discusses his
naivete about certain aspects of filmmaking, relates production stories and points
out aspects of the film he doesn't like. Soderbergh watches with the eye of a
fellow director, focusing on technical points of cinematic craft. Never dull, it's a
discussion that enhances one's understanding of the practical day-to-day demands
of shooting a film.
- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?: Too Shocking for Its Time (480i; 1.78:1, enhanced;
10:37): Former MPAA head Jack Valenti discusses the controversy over the film's
language and subject matter. Other participants include film critic Richard Schickel, film
professor Dr. Drew Casper and Bobbie O'Steen, widow of the film's editor.
- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?: A Daring Work of Raw Excellence (480i; 1.78:1,
enhanced; 20:14): This featurette provides both a critical overview of Albee's play and a
history of its journey to the screen. The participants from the previous featurette reappear,
along with Wexler and, of special note, playwright Edward Albee.
- 1966 Mike Nichols Interview (480i; 1.33:1; 9:00): Interviewed by NBC shortly after the
film's release, Nichols discusses his directing style, the making of Virginia Woolf and his
life and career up to that point.
- Sandy Dennis Screen Test (1080p; 2.35:1; 7:13): A portion of this screen test appears in
"A Daring Work of Raw Excellence". Roddy McDowall plays Nick.
- Elizabeth Taylor: Intimate Portrait (480i; 1.33:1; 1:06:31): This original documentary
aired on ABC in 1975. Hosted by Peter Lawford, it's an unabashed love letter to the star,
including interviews with Rock Hudson, Roddy McDowall, director Richard Brooks and
Taylor's mother, Sara.
- Trailers
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Blu-ray Movie, Overall Score and Recommendation
"Who's afraid of Virginia Woolf?" is a line that Albee once saw written in soap on the mirror
behind a bar. It struck him as "a rather typical university, intellectual joke", and years later he
incorporated it into a play set at a university, attributing the gag to an unidentified attendee at the
party preceding the action and later repeated by Martha, who finds it hilarious. (In the film as in
many stage productions, it is sung to the tune of "Here We Go 'Round the Mulberry Bush",
which is in the public domain, as opposed to "Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf?", which must
be licensed from Disney.) Much ink has been spilled attempting to identify deep meaning in the
joke's literary reference, but it resists any definitive interpretation, which, I suspect, is why it
appealed to Albee. By the end of Virginia Woolf, the laughter has vanished. Only the fear
remains. Highest recommendation.