6.6 | / 10 |
Users | 2.5 | |
Reviewer | 3.5 | |
Overall | 3.3 |
Insurance investigator Maindrian Pace and his team lead double lives as unstoppable car thieves. When a shady Argentine buyer puts down $200,000 on a 48-car order, Pace and his crew race to deliver. As Pace himself prepares to steal the final car, a 1973 Ford Mustang codenamed "Eleanor", he is unaware that his business partner has tipped off the police after a dispute.
Starring: H.B. Halicki, Marion Busia, Jerry Daugirda, James McIntyre, George Cole (VI)Crime | 100% |
Drama | Insignificant |
Action | Insignificant |
Video codec: MPEG-4 AVC
Video resolution: 1080p
Aspect ratio: 1.84:1
Original aspect ratio: 1.85:1
English: DTS 5.1 (755 kbps)
English: Dolby Digital 5.1 (640 kbps)
English: Dolby Digital 2.0
None
25GB Blu-ray Disc
Two-disc set (1 BD, 1 DVD)
DVD copy
Region free
Movie | 3.5 | |
Video | 3.5 | |
Audio | 3.0 | |
Extras | 3.0 | |
Overall | 3.5 |
Millions of viewers know the Jerry Bruckheimer-produced Gone in 60 Seconds starring Nicolas Cage and Angelina Jolie, but many don't know that it's a remake. Fewer still have seen the no-budget 1974 original, because it was a truly independent production at a time when the notion of "independent cinema" didn't exist. Writer, producer, director and star H.B. "Toby" Halicki had no money and zero experience in filmmaking, but he loved cars and he wanted to make the greatest car chase film of all time. One can debate whether Gone, with its concluding 40-minute pursuit, is the "greatest" of all car chase films, but there's no arguing that it's one-of-a-kind. Among other things, no one today would take the kind of crazy risks that Halicki took in the real locations he and his amateur crew "borrowed", usually on Sunday when the permit inspector wasn't working. Halicki had moved to California from Dunkirk, New York, a location he made a point of including in Gone. He'd grown up in the family towing business, and in California he started a body shop. By the time he made Gone, he was doing the kind of insurance work that his character in the film performs as a cover for his real business, which is auto theft. No one ever proved that Halicki based that part of Gone on his own life, but his knowledge of then-current car theft techniques was so extensive that rumors abounded after the film was released. Of course, after the film's enormous success (of which Halicki kept most of the profits, because no studio was involved), Halicki was wealthy enough to indulge his passion for cars and other collectibles without having to do anything else. Still, the appetite for filmmaking endured. In 1982, he made another car chase extravaganza called The Junkman. In 1989, he began production on a sequel to Gone, during which he was killed on the set by an accident that, in a tragic irony, did not even involve an automobile. (Halicki's widow, Denice, who escaped without injury, recounts the incident in the disc's extras.)
Outcries are already being heard over Halicki Films's 1080p, AVC-encoded Blu-ray presentation of Gone in 60 Seconds. My favorite observation so far is from a user review that complains: "When ya shot [sic] on 35 mm film and blow it up you also blow up the grain"—which is the equivalent of saying a rose is a rose. For most of the last century, movies were shot on 35mm film, which recorded the imagery on "grain" (which is what film is made of), and that imagery was then "blown up" for projection onto screens much larger than most display devices used by people who watch Blu-ray. Some of the images on those big screens were grainier than others. Some of them were darker than others. Some had weaker and some had stronger colors. The image on this Blu-ray is what low-budget filmmaking often looked like when one went to the theater in the 1970s. As head cameraman Jack Vacek confirms in his commentary, the film was shot with "available light", which means there was no additional lighting to get sufficient exposure in some scenes. Some of the night scenes are way too dark and have always been that way. Some of the interior scenes are too dark, because Halicki shot them in places like his home, which, as Vacek notes, had dark mahogany paneling, which didn't reflect any light back on the actors. The film stock itself was Seventies vintage and not the best quality. As demonstrated in the restoration portion of the "Life and Times" documentary, it had faded almost to white when CFI set out to restore it in 2000. Would it be possible to "remake" the images with current technology? Of course. Modern digital techniques have progressed to the point where, with enough time and money, almost any film could be pulled apart in the digital realm and reconstructed. The night scenes could be re-composed with new shadow detail; the grain could be largely removed; the colors could be repainted; and scenes where focus wanders could be stabilized. But would the resulting film still be H.B. Halicki's Gone in 60 Seconds? Not to me, and not, I suspect, to many of its fans. (See generally the Ultimate Hunter Edition of Predator.) One still too often encounters the assumption that Blu-ray is somehow a magic box into which you feed a film and, no matter what the source, it will emerge pristine and beautiful. Blu-ray doesn't work that way, nor should it. Blu-ray should offer an accurate representation, and that's all. The demand for anything else smacks of revisionism, and the oft-heard complaint that, "Well [fill-in-name-of-film] comes from the same period, and it looks great!" is meaningless. Films and their source elements aren't like Pringles. They aren't uniform, and they don't stack up neatly with one another. As for Gone, the black levels are solid, as my screencaps should demonstrate. The detail ranges from moderate, in less focused shots, to very good in those that are well-focused. The colors may not "pop", but they are accurate if you knew that area of California during the period (and I did). The best shots to go by are the ones taken in direct sunlight. Those just happen to include almost all of the chase scene. (The opening shots are blurry and soft because of the optical process used until relatively recently to superimpose credits. As many times as this gets explained to people, they still insist on selecting screencaps from a credit sequence to demonstrate the supposedly "poor" quality of a transfer.) Exceptionally grainy material is always at risk for compression errors, but I didn't see any. As should be obvious by this point, grain reduction was not an issue.
Two issues are raised by the Blu-ray's audio tracks, one technical, the other substantive. The technical issue is that none of the three tracks is lossless. There's DTS 5.1 (at the "half" bitrate of 755 kbps), Dolby Digital (at the maximum bitrate of 640 kbps) and DD stereo (at 192 kbps). These are the same options offered on the accompanying DVD (except for the DD 5.1, which the DVD offers at the anemic bitrate of 384 kbps). Although Halicki Films may be new to Blu-ray, the technicians listed in the disc's credits presumably are not. They should have advised Mrs. Halicki that the lack of lossless audio would cost the disc credibility with the Blu-ray buying public. Still, in actual listening, either of the two 5.1 tracks provides an acceptable experience, especially when you consider that they were manufactured from very rough source elements by Todd-AO, in a process described in the "Life and Times" documentary. The original dialogue has been retained and is firmly anchored to the center; it's as intelligible as it can be, given the conditions under which it was recorded. The original engine, traffic and collision sounds, which were full of distortions and overloads, have been largely replaced, but with a high degree of care for authenticity. These are the sounds that are most likely to pan from side to side or front to rear, though such effects are modestly applied. Which brings us to the music, which is the substantive issue. When the film was remastered for DVD in 2000, the music (including six songs), which had been written by Halicki's brother, Ronald, and Philip Kachaturian, was replaced with a score by Bill Maxwell and Lou Pardini. Fans have been protesting ever since. It is plain from the comments of the restoration team in the "Life and Times" documentary that both they and Denice Halicki consider this version of the soundtrack to be the new "standard", but the announcement of the Blu-ray raised hopes that perhaps the original mono track would be included. It isn't. Those are the facts, and consumers will have to make an informed decision on whether that's a dealbreaker. What follows is merely a theory, but reading between the lines, I have serious doubts that we will ever get the original mono track on Blu-ray. Most music substitutions result from rights issues, and I suspect this one is no exception. Gone was tied up in complex and expensive litigation for five years after Halicki's death, including claims brought by composer Ronald Halicki. Although a California court ultimately awarded Halicki's widow, Denice, the rights to Gone, I'd be willing to bet that the rights to any music of which Ronald Halicki claims authorship are sufficiently unclear that neither Denice nor anyone with whom she'd want to do business wants to touch the score with the proverbial ten-foot pole. (H.B. Halicki was notoriously poor on documentation. He left a one-page will, on which he wrote a note: "Split the money, guys, and have a good time. No probate.") One of the advantages of doing disc reviews is that I spend much more time poring over extras than I otherwise might. It wasn't until I listened to Denice talk about the litigation in the disc's interviews that I started thinking about who might have been involved and how that might have affected the film's restoration.
All of the extras have been ported over from previous DVD editions, but not every existing extra has been included. It appears that some may have been originally planned, then omitted at the last minute, because the back cover lists interviews with Parnelli Jones, J.C. Agajanian, Jr., and Bobby Ore. These appeared on the 2000 DVD, but are not included here.
The title Gone in 60 Seconds comes from an illuminated warning that flashes at a racetrack during the film admonishing spectators to lock their cars. The irony is that, if Pace and his gang want your car, locking it makes no difference at all. That's just one of the many jokes stashed throughout Gone. The film is also brutally honest in its depiction of vehicular mayhem and the injuries to innocent bystanders. People get hurt, some seriously, and ambulances arrive to cart them away. Halicki may have loved the adrenaline rush of fast cars, but he was more honest in showing the dangers than most Hollywood thrillers. It's just another of the many qualities that made him special. For all its flaws, highly recommended.
2019
2016
2018
1983
1991
2012
1974
1998
Import
1978
Special Edition
1986
1983
2020
1997
1989
2006
1998
2019
2003
2022
2019